If you'll recall, a little while back HTC waved its white flag amid AMOLED shortages and made the jump to the readily-available SLCD for its Desire and Nexus One handsets. As a quick recap, here's what CEO Peter Chou said about the swap:
"The SLCD displays provide consumers with a comparable visual
experience to HTC's current 3.7 inch displays with some additional
benefits including battery performance."
So, just how "comparable" is the SLCD? To find out, we picked up both flavors of the Desire
to perform some comparison tests. Let's start off with the picture
quality: what caught our attention straight away was how much sharper
SLCD is, but alas, AMOLED is still in the lead for vibrancy and
brightness. We dug a little deeper and learned that this has to do with
the different pixel arrangements on the two types of panels -- unlike
traditional TFT LCD panels, AMOLED's PenTile RGBG (red, green, blue,
green, etc.) filter matrix utilizes just two subpixels per pixel
instead of three in the same amount of space, thus allowing greater
transmittance due to the larger red and blue subpixels. But obviously,
the downside is that the pictures aren't as sharp as the denser-packed
SLCD. Read on for more! Another noticeable difference is that this SLCD has a warmer tone and -- to our surprise -- better contrast than our AMOLED, even though the latter panel produces darker blacks
(as the black pixels don't transmit any light at all). Both of these
findings are presumably the side effects of AMOLED's larger red and
blue subpixels (with blue ones being the largest of the three colors),
and consequently, we get a more faithful color reproduction from SLCD.
We then compared viewing angles and concluded that AMOLED and SLCD
respectively owned the side-way test and vertical test, but the dead
zones were so negligible that most people wouldn't notice them.
Next up is the reflection test. In our Desire and Legend
reviews we've moaned about how AMOLED screens look horribly washed out
under day light, so we were hoping that the SLCD Desire wouldn't suffer
from the same flaw. However, the actual outcome was rather
disappointing: with both screens boosted to maximum luminescence, the
brighter AMOLED was actually a touch more visible than the SLCD, but still far from usable on a bright day. In fact, we've seen better outdoor performance on the Nokia N8's
AMOLED screen, so it seems that HTC's glossy glass is to be blamed for
the rather surprising test results here -- we've certainly seen the
same problem plaguing our LCD-donning Hero as well. Anyway, you can see more outdoor ugliness in the video below.
To draw an end to our comparison test, we decided to see if Chou is
right about SLCD sipping less battery juice than AMOLED. To do this, we
put both Froyo phones
on airplane mode, disabled screen timeout, set the brightness to
medium, made sure no extra services were running, and then let the same
movie -- Four Lions, if you must know -- burn them off until
they give up. Well, guess what? Chou might be wrong -- in our two runs,
the SLCD Desire consistently died within a little under five hours,
whereas its AMOLED brother was still going strong with about 30%
battery left. And before you say it, we even swapped the batteries
across the two phones before the second run, so it's safe to say that
AMOLED is actually the more efficient hamster here.
Wrap-up
So here we have it: there really is no clear winner between SLCD and
AMOLED when it comes to picture quality -- the former offers a sharper
picture plus a more realistic color reproduction, whereas the latter
shows off brighter, more vibrant colors. But as we concluded earlier,
AMOLED seems to be slightly ahead of the game with its power
efficiency. Still, this doesn't help the fact that both screen types
suffer from the same glossy glass on the Desire, thus rendering them
almost equally as useless under day light. Come on now, HTC: whatever
you're announcing this Wednesday, let's hope that you have something real special up your sleeves to please our eyes, literally.
